Israel seeks funds for separate Arab roads
by Chris McGreal
Israel is pressing foreign donors to finance the construction of a web of roads through the occupied territories - made necessary by the building of the vast "security" barrier and Jewish settlements in the West Bank.
The Israeli government seeks foreign funding to upgrade the back roads that Palestinians are forced to use - after being banned from routes used by Jewish settlers.
It also wants funding to build new roads which take account of the barrier and its settlements. The plan envisages roads that would run parallel to each other - one for Jews, the other for Arabs.
European donors have recoiled from the proposal, in part because they are concerned that funding the new roads will breach July's International Court of Justice ruling against support for construction of the barrier. The court said it should be torn down because it breaches the Geneva conventions.
But diplomats say the US may be more willing to pay...
Full Article: Guardian UK
rootsie on 09.06.04 @ 12:51 PM CST [
link]
Falluja bomb kills 7 U.S. troops
BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- The U.S. military command in Baghdad has confirmed that seven Marines and three Iraqi guardsmen were killed in a car bomb in Falluja.
The attack occurred late Monday morning on the outskirts of the city.
The explosions sent the engine from the car used in the bombing "a good distance" from the site, AP quoted a military official as saying on condition of anonymity.
Two Humvees were destroyed in the attack, AP reported witnesses as saying.
U.S. forces have not patrolled inside Fallujah since April, when U.S. Marines ended a three-week siege, AP said. The city has since fallen into the hands of insurgents who have used it as a base to manufacture car bombs and launch attacks on U.S. and Iraqi government forces.
Full Article: cnn.com
rootsie on 09.06.04 @ 12:39 PM CST [
link]
Spy Case Renews Debate Over Pro-Israel Lobby's Ties to Pentagon
by James Risen and David Johnston
WASHINGTON, Sept. 5 - It began like most national security investigations, with a squad of Federal Bureau of Investigation agents surreptitiously tailing two men, noting where they went and whom they met. What was different about this case was that the surveillance subjects were lobbyists for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, and one of their contacts turned out to be a policy analyst at the Pentagon.
The ensuing criminal investigation into whether Aipac officials passed classified information from the Pentagon official to Israel has become one of the most byzantine counterintelligence stories in recent memory. So far, the Justice Department has not accused anyone of wrongdoing and no one has been arrested.
Aipac has dismissed the accusations as baseless, and Israel has denied conducting espionage operations in the United States.
Behind the scenes, however, the case has reignited a furious and long-running debate about the close relationship between Aipac, the pro-Israel lobbying organization, and a conservative group of Republican civilian officials at the defense department, who are in charge of the office that employs Lawrence A. Franklin, the Pentagon analyst.
Their hard-line policy views on Iraq, Iran and the rest of the Middle East have been controversial and influential within the Bush administration.
"They have no case,'' said Michael Ledeen, a conservative scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and a friend of Mr. Franklin. "If they have a case, why hasn't anybody been arrested or indicted?''
Nearly a dozen officials who have been briefed on the investigation said in interviews last week that the F.B.I. began the inquiry as a national security matter based on specific accusations that Aipac employees had been a conduit for secrets between Israel and the Pentagon. These officials said that the F.B.I., in consultation with the Justice Department, had established the necessary legal foundation required under the law before beginning the investigation.
A half dozen people sympathetic to Aipac and the civilian group at the defense department said they viewed the investigation in different terms, as a politically motivated attempt to discredit Aipac and the Pentagon group. Supporters of Aipac have said the organization is being dragged into an intelligence controversy largely because of its close ties to a Republican administration and the Israeli government of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.
Friends and associates of the civilian group at the Pentagon believe they are under assault by adversaries from within the intelligence community who have opposed them since before the war in Iraq. The Pentagon civilians, led by Paul D. Wolfowitz, the deputy defense secretary, and Douglas J. Feith, the undersecretary for policy, were among the first in the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks to urge military action to topple the regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, an approach favored by Aipac and Israel.
Mr. Wolfowitz and Mr. Feith were part of a larger network of policy experts inside and out of the Bush administration who forcefully made the case that the war with Iraq was part of the larger fight against terrorism.
The Pentagon group circulated its own intelligence assessments, which have since been discredited by the Central Intelligence Agency and by the independent Sept. 11 commission, arguing that there was a terrorist alliance between the Hussein regime and Al Qaeda.
The group has also advocated that the Bush administration adopt a more aggressive policy toward Iran, and some of its members have quietly begun to argue for regime change in Tehran. The administration has not yet adopted that stance, however, and the Pentagon conservatives have been engaged in a debate with officials at the State Department and other agencies urging a more moderate approach to Iran.
Full Article: New York TimesIt's hard to figure out what's going on here, but it seems like there are whistleblowers who are willing to take Wolfowitz, Ledeen, et al, on. The issue is not about feeding intel to Israel, that's for sure. The CFR is strongly against taking Iran on militarily, at least for now. I keep saying this, but Bush might really get Watergated after his re-election.
rootsie on 09.06.04 @ 12:36 PM CST [
link]
Sunday, September 5th
Halliburton Natural Gas Bribery Scandal in Nigeria
by Mike Oduniyi and Ahamefula Ogbu
Following continued investigations on the alleged $180 million (about N25.2billion) bribery scandal over the Nigeria Liquefied Natural Gas (NLNG) Project, Halliburton yesterday submitted documents listing the names of Nigeria government officials involved in the scandal to a French judge in Paris.
But in Abuja, the House of Representatives yesterday resolved that all companies linked with TSKJ and Halliburton in Nigeria should be excluded from new contracts pending conclusion of investigations on the matter.
In a bid to absolve itself of any criminal liability, Halliburton has submitted documents listing the names of Federal Government officials involved in the scandal to the French Judge presiding over the investigation in Paris yesterday.
The documents that are in the form of hand written notes are bound to cause a lot of discomfort for both present and past government officials, as it details out the precise amounts set aside for each government functionary with the intent to bribe.
Sources disclosed that the documents were submitted by executives of Halliburton to the French magistrate, Judge Renaud van Ruymbeke at 5 p.m. in Paris as part of efforts by the US oil service firm to cooperate with authorities investigating the bribery scandal.
Halliburton has insisted on its innocence since investigations began last year by both the Securities and Exchange Commission of the US and French authorities, and has maintained that the alleged bribing of Nigerian officials occurred before its acquisition of Kellog Brown & Root (KBR). Halliburton has also instructed its representatives in Nigeria to submit the same documents to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFFC), which waded into the investigation in Nigeria last month.
Full Article: allafrica.com
rootsie on 09.05.04 @ 08:29 PM CST [
link]
US: Food Waste and Hunger Exist Side by Side
by Haider Rizvi
NEW YORK - ''Do you want these? They are so fresh,'' says Catherine, holding up a bunch of grapes she just pulled out from one of the trash bags piled up on the sidewalk. ''Take this, man. It's good too,'' adds her friend Morlan, holding out a loaf of bread.
Though happy to have found something for dinner, both Catherine, 21, and Morlan, 19, wonder why some edible food is thrown out as garbage in New York City
''They only sell this food to the rich,'' says Catherine pointing to the upscale grocery store that put out the bags.
Inside the store, the manager is visibly upset with Catherine and other young people who are stuffing their backpacks with fruits and vegetables from the trash bags. ''They are picking up garbage,'' says the manager. ''I don't know why they are doing this.''
''I have zero cash right now, and no place to stay,'' Morlan told Tierramérica. ''What do you expect me to do?''
Such scenes are becoming increasingly commonplace on the streets of U.S. cities, despite the enormous quantity of food that the world's most affluent nation produces every year.
Official surveys indicate that every year more than 350 billion pounds (160 billion kg) of edible food is available for human consumption in the United States. Of that total, nearly 100 billion pounds (45 billion kg) -- including fresh vegetables, fruits, milk, and grain products -- are lost to waste by retailers, restaurants, and consumers.
By contrast, the amount of food required to meet the needs of the hungry is only four billion pounds, according to Food Not Bombs, an advocacy group, which estimates that every year more than 30 million people in the United States are going hungry on regular basis.
Full Article: commondreams.org
rootsie on 09.05.04 @ 08:22 PM CST [
link]
Time to play the Osama card...
U.S. Near Seizing bin Laden, Official SaysBy Matthew Pennington
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (AP) - The United States and its allies have moved closer to capturing Osama bin Laden in the last two months, a top U.S. counterterrorism official said in a television interview broadcast Saturday.
"If he has a watch, he should be looking at it because the clock is ticking. He will be caught," Joseph Cofer Black, the U.S. State Department coordinator for counterterrorism, told private Geo television network.
Asked if concrete progress had been made during the last two months - when Pakistan has arrested dozens of terror suspects including some key al-Qaida operatives - Black said, "Yes, I would say this."
Black, who briefed a group of Pakistani journalists after talks with officials here Friday, said he could not predict exactly when bin Laden and other top al-Qaida fugitives would be nabbed.
"What I tell people, I would be surprised but not necessarily shocked if we wake up tomorrow and he's been caught along with all his lieutenants. That can happen because of the programs and infrastructure in place," he told Geo.
Bin Laden and his top associate, Ayman al-Zawahri, are believed to be hiding some place along the rugged border between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Officials have divulged no solid intelligence about bin Laden's precise whereabouts, and it's not clear if they have any.
Full Article: myway.com
rootsie on 09.05.04 @ 12:20 PM CST [
link]
The Bush Neo-Cons and Israel
by Stephen Green
[Editors' Note: This is a slightly updated version of a ground-breaking essay exposing the relationship of the neo-cons embedded in the Bush administration with the government of Israel.]
Since 9-11, a small group of "neo-conservatives" in the Administration have effectively gutted--they would say reformed--traditional American foreign and security policy. Notable features of the new Bush doctrine include the pre-emptive use of unilateral force, and the undermining of the United Nations and the principle instruments and institutions of international law....all in the cause of fighting terrorism and promoting homeland security.
Some skeptics, noting the neo-cons' past academic and professional associations, writings and public utterances, have suggested that their underlying agenda is the alignment of U.S. foreign and security policies with those of Ariel Sharon and the Israeli right wing. The administration's new hard line on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict certainly suggests that, as perhaps does the destruction, with U.S. soldiers and funds, of the military capacity of Iraq, and the current belligerent neo-con campaign against the other two countries which constitute a remaining counterforce to Israeli military hegemony in the region--Iran and Syria.
Have the neo-conservatives--many of whom are senior officials in the Defense Department, National Security Council and Office of the Vice President--had dual agendas, while professing to work for the internal security of the United States against its terrorist enemies?
A review of the internal security backgrounds of some of the best known among them strongly suggests the answer.
Full Article: counterpunch.orgThis is a good survey of the Wolfowitz. Perle et al rogues' gallery. Pat Buchanan was on Meet the Press this morning and asked why on earth the neo-cons who led Bush and us into this disaster are not kicked out of office, why people can't see that the terrorists are not fighting American principles, but American policy, including rabid support for Sharon and ones to his right like Netanyahu. He said he doubts Osama got a hold of the Declaration of Independence and had a temper tantrum. Weird times. When Pat Buchanan speaks to the opinions of ones like me.
rootsie on 09.05.04 @ 10:33 AM CST [
link]
U.S. Troops in Iraq See Highest Injury Toll Yet-1100 in August
BAGHDAD, Sept. 4 -- About 1,100 U.S. soldiers and Marines were wounded in Iraq during August, by far the highest combat injury toll for any month since the war began and an indication of the intensity of battles flaring in urban areas.
U.S. medical commanders say the sharp rise in battlefield injuries reflects more than three weeks of fighting by two Army and one Marine battalion in the southern city of Najaf. At the same time, U.S. units frequently faced combat in a sprawling Shiite Muslim slum in Baghdad and in
the Sunni cities of Fallujah, Ramadi and Samarra, all of which remain under the control of insurgents two months after the transfer of political authority."They were doing battlefield urban operations in four places at one time," said Lt. Col. Albert Maas, operations officer for the 2nd Medical Brigade, which oversees U.S. combat hospitals in Iraq. "It's like working in downtown Detroit. You're going literally building to building."
...There were also indications that troops might have suffered more severe wounds in August than in previous months.
At the Baghdad hospital, staff members are accustomed to seeing the most severely injured soldiers and Marines. The hospital, the only one in Iraq where the military's brain and eye surgeons work, handles the worst head wounds. Normally, perhaps half the patients who come to the emergency room qualify as "acute" cases, a term that indicates severity and urgency.
In August, however, the rate of acute cases jumped to three of four ER patients.
"It was intense," said Lt. Col. Greg Kidwell, who oversees the emergency room at the hospital.
Full Article: Washington Post
rootsie on 09.05.04 @ 10:18 AM CST [
link]
Iraq's Sadr Group Says Sunni Extremists a Threat
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Prominent members of rebel Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr's movement have become the latest targets in a shadowy insurgency gripping Iraq, raising fears of more unrest in a country plagued by violence.
Sadr's followers say they believe the attacks are part of a wider campaign to target Iraq's Shi'ite majority, destined for power in a democratic Iraq having been sidelined for decades by Sunni Arab rulers.
Last Tuesday, members of Sadr's movement heading to Najaf were attacked by gunmen on a road notorious for drive-by shootings and kidnappings near Latifiya, south of Baghdad.
The attack, which killed three, including a political leader in the group, Basheer al-Jazairi, came a day after another member of the group, Ali al-Mohammadawi, was shot dead outside his home in southern Baghdad.
Full Article:ReutersA 'shadowy insurgency'? Come on. Baathists and fundamentalists. 'Sunni triangle.' They control the entire western part of the country and a lot north of Bagdhad. This mystification is deliberate. Otherwise they would have to admit to the magnitude of the disaster.
rootsie on 09.05.04 @ 10:11 AM CST [
link]
Parties to Injustice: Democrats Will Do Anything To Keep Me Off the Ballot
by Ralph Nader
This summer, swarms of Democratic Party lawyers, propagandists, harassers and assorted operatives have been conducting an unsavory war against my campaign's effort to secure a spot on the presidential ballots in various states. It is not enough that both major parties, in state after state, have used the legislatures to erect huge barriers, unique among Western democracies, to third party and independent candidacies. Now they are engaging in what can only be called dirty tricks and frivolous lawsuits to keep me and my running mate, Peter Miguel Camejo, off the ballot while draining precious dollars from our campaign chest.
This contemptuous drive is fueled with large amounts of unregulated money, much of it funneled through the National Progress Fund, an ostensibly independent group led by Toby Moffett, a former Democratic congressman who is currently a partner in a largely Republican lobbying firm called the Livingston Group. By contrast, to defend ourselves from the assault, we have to draw on funds that are limited and regulated by the Federal Election Commission.
Full Article: Washington Post
rootsie on 09.05.04 @ 09:56 AM CST [
link]
Marked for death, the tattoo gang kids: Rebel youths pay a terrible price under zero tolerance, Honduras-style
For the street children of the Honduran capital, Tegucigalpa, escape comes in two ways. The first is by way of a solvent-based glue called Resistol which they inhale to induce a four-hour long high.
But there is a more final exit that the street children dread - murder at the hands of the city's so-called 'death cars' and dumped in skips, dustbins and ditches.
It is not just the street children, who beg and sell their bodies on the streets of Honduras, who are victims. Other youths too are victims of a social cleansing that is sanctioned by a large proportion of the country's society.
They are Honduras's tattooed gang members with affiliations to the Los Angeles gangland. They are the number one enemy of the country's literate classes, denounced by politicians and in the media, and exterminated by police and private death squads.
Some 700 children have died in the last two years, according to Amnesty International which has been running a campaign against child murder in Honduras.
And some of these killings have been on a large scale. The latest took place on 17 May when 105 prisoners, largely young gang members with the Mara Salvatrucha gang, were locked into the El Porvenir prison in the textile-producing city of San Pedro Sula and burned alive.
It follows a similar mass killing at La Ceiba in northern Honduras last year when 51 members of the 18th Street gang were summarily shot, and their wing set on fire.
But while it has been the prison fires that have drawn the most attention, it is the constant attrition against the country's youth that is still alarming Amnesty.
Full Article:Guardian UK"Rebel" youths? I guess it's revolutionary to try to survive.
rootsie on 09.05.04 @ 09:49 AM CST [
link]
Friday, September 3rd
An African Foul-Up, With an Intriguing Cast of Britons
by Michael Wines
JOHANNESBURG, Sept. 2 - They say the battle of Waterloo was won on the playing fields of Eton. Alas, the same appears not to be true of coups in Equatorial Guinea.
A week ago, South African prosecutors tied the patrician son of Margaret Thatcher, the former British prime minister, to an improbable, botched coup in Equatorial Guinea, a minuscule, humid, African dictatorship. Now others in England's political and boarding-school elite are being dragged, over furious denials, into what is becoming a black eye for the British, whose colonialist image in Africa has been waning.
The would-be coup's ever more byzantine story, redolent of greed, stupidity, code names like Smelly and Scratcher, and "a large splodge of wonga" - apparently an Etonism for money - is providing a field day for South Africa's splashy press and its British mentors.
Full Article: New York Times
rootsie on 09.03.04 @ 10:07 PM CST [
more..]
Outraged Kerry takes the gloves off at last after Republican jibes
by Julian Borger
John Kerry launched a stinging and personal counter-attack against George Bush's administration, singling out Dick Cheney, the vice-president, for having "refused to serve" in Vietnam.
The ferocity of the Democratic party's presidential challenger at the midnight rally of supporters in Ohio marked a sharp change in his campaign tactics. A few hours earlier, at the Republican party convention in New York, President Bush had joined in Mr Cheney's derision of Senator Kerry as a vacillating liberal.
The president repeated those charges yesterday at a rally in Pennsylvania, lampooning Mr Kerry for voting to go to war in Iraq and then opposing a funding request in the Senate for the occupation.
"He said he was proud of his vote, and then he just said the whole thing was a complicated matter. His words," Mr Bush said. "Here are my words: There's nothing complicated about supporting our troops in combat."
The charge that Mr Kerry was "unfit for command" was a main theme of the Republican convention, provoking outrage from the senator. He said: "I'm not going to have my commitment to defend this country questioned by those who refused to serve when they could have, and by those who misled the nation into Iraq."
Mr Kerry's seemed to be using his speech to release months of pent-up anger.
In the face of a campaign by rightwing Vietnam war veterans to question whether he merited his five combat medals, the senator had until yesterday refrained from referring directly to the actions of Mr Bush or Mr Cheney during the Vietnam era.
Both men avoided combat, while the young Lieutenant Kerry was fighting in the Mekong Delta. Mr Bush signed up with the Texas air national guard as a pilot; Mr Cheney was granted five deferments from the draft for attending college, then graduate school and finally for having a child.
The new gloves-off strategy begins after a week of debate and unease within the Kerry camp over the wisdom of restraint. It coincided with the hiring of Joe Lockhart, a former spokesman for Bill Clinton with a combative reputation.
In yesterday's speech Mr Kerry made it clear he was aiming his accusations principally at the vice-president, who had used his Wednesday night speech to portray the Democratic candidate as unfit to be commander in chief.
Mr Kerry responded: "I'll leave it up to the voters to decide whether five deferments makes someone more qualified to defend this nation than two tours of duty."
Full Article: Guardian UKIs Kerry insane? This is the stupidest campaign strategy. Whose cojones are bigger than whose? Ick. Was the last time Kerry was proud of anything he did 1970? Here we are in a mess that could leave Vietnam in the dust, and Kerry doesn't even see fit to recall to our minds the John Kerry of 1971 who spoke out on the horror of that war. Instead he, like Bush, is determined to continue the folly.
rootsie on 09.03.04 @ 09:41 PM CST [
link]
Al-Sadr Says U.S. Can't Defeat Militia
By Abdul Hussein Al-Obeidi
KUFA, Iraq (AP) - Rebel Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr declared U.S. forces can never defeat his Mahdi militia in a defiant speech read out to 2,000 supporters during the first Friday prayers since the end of a brutal three-week standoff with American troops.
Al-Sadr aides said the cleric initially planned to deliver the sermon himself from a makeshift pulpit on the street outside the Kufa mosque, which was closed last week after militants pulled out under the peace accord. But he abandoned the idea amid fears it could raise tensions.
Iraqi security forces sealed off roads and fired warning shots near the city in an effort to keep the jostling crowds in check.
``Many, but not all, think that the American army is invincible. But now it's appeared only truth is invincible,'' Sheik Jaber al-Khafaji, said in a statement read on al-Sadr's behalf. ``America claims to control the world through globalization, but it couldn't do the same with the Mahdi Army.''
Last week's accord that ended three weeks of fighting between U.S. forces and al-Sadr militiamen in Kufa's twin city of Najaf gave the interim government control of that city. It also disentangled U.S. forces from bitter street fighting while allowing al-Sadr and his militants to walk away free - and keep their guns.
But al-Sadr portrayed the American withdrawal from Najaf's devastated Old City as a sign of U.S. military weakness. ``We should keep in mind the lessons of what happened in Najaf,'' the cleric's statement said.
The remarks appeared intended to rally al-Sadr's forces. It was not clear whether they signaled a retreat from al-Sadr's commitment to talks between his envoys and the interim government of Prime Minister Ayad Allawi to stop weeks of clashes in the militant stronghold of Sadr City, a sprawling east Baghdad slum.
Full Article: Guardian UK
rootsie on 09.03.04 @ 08:43 PM CST [
link]
Maid who won suit against Sony executive decries slavery
LOS ANGELES - A Filipino woman who won $825,000 in a lawsuit claiming a Hollywood executive and his wife enslaved her said the case should be a warning to others.
Nena Ruiz, 60, is a former schoolteacher from the Philippines who worked as a domestic servant for James Jackson and his wife, Elizabeth.
Jackson is vice president of legal affairs for Sony Pictures Entertainment.
In a lawsuit filed last year, Ruiz claimed the Jacksons took away her passport and paid her $300 for a year's work at the couple's Culver City condominium. She said Elizabeth Jackson also slapped her and pulled her hair repeatedly.
The couple have denied the allegations, and their lawyer said they are considering appealing.
Ruiz said she often worked 18 hours a day and was forced to do strange household chores such as heating chicken nuggets and cutting up bananas or pears for the couple's two dogs while she was fed leftovers and slept in a dog bed.
Full Article: sacbee.com
rootsie on 09.03.04 @ 07:56 PM CST [
link]
Thursday, September 2nd
Tactics by Police Mute the Protesters, and Their Messages
By Michael Slackman
As the Republican National Convention approached its final evening tonight, nearly 1,800 protesters had been arrested on the streets, two-thirds of them on Tuesday night alone. But for all the anger of the demonstrations, they have barely interrupted the convention narrative, and have drawn relatively little national news coverage.
Using large orange nets to divide and conquer, and a near-zero tolerance policy for activities that even suggest the prospect of disorder, the New York Police Department has developed what amounts to a pre-emptive strike policy, cutting off demonstrations before they grow large enough, loud enough, or unruly enough to affect the convention.
The demonstrations, too, have thus far been more restrained than many recent protests elsewhere; five years ago in Seattle, for example, there was widespread arson and window-smashing, none of which has occurred here. Lacking bloody scenes of billy-club-wielding police or billowing clouds of tear gas, the cameras - and the public's attention - have focused elsewhere.
"It is almost easier to explain what you are not getting here," said Ted Koppel, anchor and managing editor of ABC's "Nightline," when he was asked why news organizations have given little time to the protests. "What you are not getting here is a replay of 1968 in Chicago."
Full Article: New York Times
rootsie on 09.02.04 @ 07:44 PM CST [
link]
Cleric Says It's Right to Fight U.S. Civilians in Iraq
CAIRO (Reuters) - An Egyptian cleric based in Qatar and often described as a moderate has ruled that it is a religious duty for Muslims to fight Americans in Iraq, including U.S. civilians, his office director said Thursday.
But Sheikh Youssef al-Qaradawi said that two French journalists kidnapped in Iraq should be freed immediately.
Qaradawi gave his opinion at a meeting Tuesday evening at the Egyptian journalists' syndicate in Cairo.
``All of them (U.S. military personnel and civilians) are invaders who came from their country to invade our country and fighting them is a duty,'' said his office director Essam Talima, quoting a fatwa or ruling on religious law by Qaradawi.
Qaradawi is revered in much of the Muslim world for his intellectual rigor and ability to adapt the fundamental tenets of Islam to the modern world.
Full Article: Reuters
rootsie on 09.02.04 @ 07:39 PM CST [
link]
Bush Reloaded
by Satya Sagar
...In fact given George Bush Jr’s brilliant record in doing permanent damage to the very political, economic and cultural foundations on which the US Super-turned Hyper-turned Imperial Power rests I would happily paraphrase ‘43’ and say ‘bring him on’ once again. Far from weeping I would actually rejoice if Bush remains as President and finishes his historical mission of dismantling, brick by brick, base by base, every outpost of the global US Empire.
Sure, I agree in the short run a new Bush Presidency could see more wars and misery than what we already have. He might go on to attack Iran next and then Syria and then North Korea. In another four years time he will come back to invade Afghanistan and Iraq once more because by then they would have surely slipped out of US control. So there we would go beating around the Bush all over again.
But despite these dire possibilities of Bush Reloaded we also need to consider the fact that US Democrats have an equally bad record of sending US troops abroad and so there is no real guarantee that America will not be at war in future under some ‘noble’ pretext or the other. After all the Democrats were the ones who were responsible for the Korean and Vietnam Wars, not to mention the bombing of Serbia- all in the service of the same military-financial-corporate complex that Bush Jr. serves. Already we know for example that Bush’s main opponent at the polls, John Kerry, objects not to the invasion of Iraq but only to the ‘way it was sold’ to the world.
So on balance, as far as many in the Third World are concerned, I think there is nothing much to really choose between the main contestants of the next US election. They are all going to bomb us anyway and to mangle the English language a bit ‘A Known Devil in the Bush is surely worth two Unknown in the Curry, er, I mean Kerry’...
Full Article: zmag.org
rootsie on 09.02.04 @ 07:34 PM CST [
link]
Wednesday, September 1st
Nobody But Bush
by Rootsie
It seems like everybody woke up today and realized John Kerry is going to lose. Badly. Weirdly enough, Arnold's speech at the RNC last night ripped it.
It was the night of the post-modern Republican. Against a spartan and tasteful backdrop (where the guady red, white, and blue banners and balloons and cavorting elephants?), and the pixillated split screens, first Schwartzenegger and the MTV Bush twins, crackin wise on Gammy Barbara and uncool (and yet cool) mom Laura...where were the Republicans?
Where Jerry Falwell? Where the blue-haired ladies from Texas? Instead of Pat Boone, the Harlem Boys' Choir. Instead of 'family values,' sexy talk and sculpted macho brawn. The camera pans to wife Maria Shriver, looking sleek and horsey and o so Kennedy (for all that she didn't know what to do with her hands-clap as her hubby led the crowd in chanting 'four more years'?). Iraq war as action-hero-land.
All to be said is 'brilliant.' If this was Rove's show, you have to hand it to him. The trap is sprung, and Kerry and Company stepped right in. The script was flipped-this time it was the Democrats with the busy suffocating decor, the sentimental slop, the painting of their candidate as super-patriot, the paeans to God and country. The Republicans look young and hip, tanned GW on the jumbo-tron in cornflower-blue shirt and blue jeans, smiling indulgently as his daughters roast him. Very GQ. Wife Laura delivered a low-key answer to Teresa Heinz's speech, celebrating the girls in Afghanistan who now can go to school, the females in the crowd waving "'W' Stands for Women" signs.
Nary a peep about the war at the Democrats' convention-the Republicans on the other hand never stopped talking about it, about the peace-loving president forced by history into the role of war-time leader. The reluctant, conflicted post-modern hero.
This election comes down to the 'undecideds,' and the Republicans did not need a media spectacle highlighting their apocalyptic Christian power base. No talking about aborted fetuses and the sanctity of hetero marriage. No. They needed to portray a Republican party embracing diversity, celebrating divergent opinions, welcoming the poor lost sheep in from the cold. They succeeded. A lot of those young Republicans in the crowd in their tailored suits look positively metro.
And Kerry made it so easy. By wrapping himself in the flag and trying to embue Vietnam in a golden glow a la WWII, he showed that the Democrats are hopelessly out of their league when it comes to the propoganda and pageantry of this new media age. They are the old fogies reminiscing in their wheelchairs while the Republicans carry it forward.
Few in that enormous march on Sunday carried signs for Kerry. 'Anyone But Bush' has backfired. Duh. Anybody but Bush has turned out to be nobody.
Remember Wavy Gravy in the 70's and his 'Nobody for President?' Because Nobody loves you when you're down and out. And Nobody cares.
rootsie on 09.01.04 @ 09:10 PM CST [
link]