RaceandHistoryHowComYouComAfrica SpeaksRootsWomenTrinicenter AmonHotep
Rootsie's Blog
Home » Archives » January 2006 » Evo Morales, Communitarian Socialism, and the Regional Power Block

[Previous entry: "Freedom for Mother Earth! The Struggle for Land in Colombia"] [Next entry: "Sabra and Shatilla: The Accused 17"]


01/11/2006:

"Evo Morales, Communitarian Socialism, and the Regional Power Block"

"Evo, what do you and the MAS understand by 'socialism,'" I asked him, when I was invited by the Executive Committee of the Bolivian Labor Central (COB). "To live in community and equality," he answered. "Fundamentally, in the peasant communities they have socialism. For example, if we speak of land. I come from the ayllu of the Department of Oruro. Clearly, where I live at this moment, in the East in Chapare, there are no ayllus. It is individual parceling, and there arise very serious problems, because it leads to small holdings, which you don't see in a peasant community where the land is communal."

"Does the socio-economic model of the MAS resemble more that of Lula, Cuba, or Hugo Chávez?" I insisted. "I believe it is something much deeper," he answered. "It is an economic model based on solidarity, reciprocity, community, and consensus. Because, for us, democracy is a consensus. In the community there is consensus, in the trade union there are majorities and minorities.

"Inside this official democracy of Bolivia they do not respect the thought, sentiments, and the sufferings of the national majorities. And within this framework we are seeking a communitarian socialism based on the community. A socialism, let's say, based on reciprocity and solidarity. And beyond that, respecting Mother Earth, the Pacha Mama. It is not possible within that model to convert Mother Earth to merchandise. In Bolivia with the agrarian reform it is better to be a vaccinated cow than a human being. For a vaccinated cow there are 25 hectares and for a human being there is nothing."
zmag.org

Replies: 2 Comments


Wednesday, January 11th, rootsie posted:

absolutely. As I commented earlier, indigenous values are are a far greater threat to 'them' than the hammer-and-sickle red commieism they try to alarm people about. That's a propoganda tack anyway.


Wednesday, January 11th, not communism posted:

there must be a differentiation made between Eurocentric Marxian "communism" and indigenous forms of communal organization.

Eurocentric "progressives" need to stop letting discourse be set by these Eurocentric political constructs and discourse.

It is BECAUSE of the boundaries set by this discourse that the powers that be can easily marginalize, downsize, propagandize and dismiss these movements in the mass media.

Home | Archives

January 2006
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Articles
Rootsie's Forum
Reasoning Board
Haiti's Coup
Venezuela Watch

Weblogs

Africa Speaks
RootsWomen
Kurt Nimmo


Back to top

Rootsie's Homepage | Forum | Articles | Weblog Homepage

Copyright (c) 2004 Rootsie.com
Rootsie.com at www.rootsie.com grants permission to cross-post original Rootsie.com articles in their entirety on community internet sites, as long as the text and title of the article are not modified. The source must be acknowledged as follows: rootsie.com at www.rootsie.com The active URL hyperlink address of the original article and the author/s copyright note must be clearly displayed. For articles from other sources, check with the original copyright holder, where applicable. For publication of rootsie.com articles in commercial sites, print and other forms, contact us here.
Powered by greymatterforums, Rootsie.com, Trinicenter.com and Rootswomen.com