Racial Classification
by Cheikh Anta Diop
A racial classification is given to a group of individuals who share a certain number of anthropological traits, which is necessary so that they not be confused with others. There are two aspects which must be distinguished, the phenotypical and genotypical. I have frequently elaborated on these two aspects.
If we speak only of the genotype, I can find a black who, at the level of his chromosomes, is closer to a Swede than Peter Botha is. But what counts in reality is the phenotype. It is the physical appearance which counts. This black, even if on the level of his cells he is closer than Peter Botha, when he is in South Africa he will live in Soweto. Throughout history, it has always been the phenotype which has been at issue; we mustn't lose sight of this fact. The phenotype is a reality, physical appearance is a reality.
Now, every time these relationships are not favorable to the Western cultures, an effort is made to undermine the cultural consciousness of Africans by telling them, `We don't even know what a race is.' What that means is, they do know what a yellow man is, they do know what a white man is. Despite the fact that the white race and the yellow race are derivatives of the black which, itself, was the first to exist as a human race, now we do not want know what it is. If Africans fall into that trap, they'll be going around in circles. They must understand the trap, understand the stakes.
It is the phenotype which as given us so much difficulty throughout history, so it is this which must be considered in these relations. It exists, is a reality and cannot be repudiated.
SOURCES:
African Origin of Civilization by Cheikh Anta Diop
Civilization or Barbarism by Cheikh Anta Diop
http://www.africawithin.com/diop/racial_classification.htmThose who accuse blacks, the ones who don't automatically reach out and embrace whites, of being "racist"...
Those who take the mtDNA evidence as an opportunity to say there is no such thing as race, and all blacks have to do is "get over it"...
Those who speek about racism in the past tense...
lack the historical understanding that would cause them to realize they're being foolish.
The "Rogues' Gallery" on this Forum demonstrates that European identity is intimately tied to the glorification of the white phenotype. It is more than ironic that the founders of the philosophical school of "Ethics" like John Stuart Mill took white supremacy as a given, not even worthy of debate, that Charles Darwin and his followers took the theory of Natural Selection and constructed evolutionary ladders with dark-skinned blacks at the bottom and whites at the top, that most 'great minds' which college students are required to study today, the philosophers and scholars who considered the most minute aspects of human characteristics, took the superiority of the white phenotype for granted.
It could be argued that Sir John Speke's preposterous "Hamitic Hypothesis" led in a direct way to the Rwandan genocide of 1994.
The primary statistical method of 19th century evolutionary biology was "Craniometry", the measuring of human skulls and the weighing of human brains.
A Twa man from Congo was put on display in the monkey cage at the Bronx Zoo in 1906.
"Race" is not a fictional or abstract concept. It is a foundation of Western thinking and plays out in pleas for 'aid' for 'poor countries', in who's in jail,
who's poor, and in countless other ways down to the interpersonal relationships between human beings.
I see inborn unexamined white arrogance on the part of people who come to the Africa Speaks and Rastafari Speaks froums to lecture and scold blacks about the nonexistence of race. What they don't get is that it's easy for them to say so, since, being white, they are never encouraged or compelled to think about race at all. And they don't realize in how ugly a manner they reveal their own arrogance born of unexamined privilege.
Privilege is granted according to skin tone, and the argument that some whites are poor and oppressed too, or that some blacks are privileged, fails to recognize the systemic nature of white supremacy.
It is not possible for a single white person to say "I am different' or "I am beyond it". We are literally born into it, and only through ruthless self-examination can we begin to move from it.
"God sees no color" they say. Aside from the question as to how they know WHAT this otherworldly abstract being they worship sees or not, this statement points to one of the many problems with religion as most people see it. Mostly unconsciously, they think to trump the argument by abstracting it, taking it off the planet. There is nothing abstract or supernatural about the way resources and privileges flow on this planet. They flow from dark-skinned peoples to light-skinned to white