Rootsie Homepage | Weblog | Tracey | Ayanna | Reasoning Forum | AmonHotep
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 23, 2024, 08:36:40 PM
Home Help Search Login Register

+  Rootsie
|-+  GENERAL
| |-+  General Board (Moderator: Rootsie)
| | |-+  The Hoax Of Female Empowerment: Desperate Females
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: The Hoax Of Female Empowerment: Desperate Females  (Read 9693 times)
Rootsie
Moderator
Roots
*****
Posts: 958

Rootsie.com


View Profile WWW
« on: October 08, 2005, 03:24:58 PM »

Reprinted from
http://rense.com/general67/fam.htm

I have seen this posted many places this week without comment. I would like to hear what other females think about it.

In "Commander in Chief," a new TV-series, President "Mackenzie Allen" (Geena Davis) juggles her responsibilities as Leader of the Free World with her duties as mother of rebellious teenage twins and a six-year-old-daughter. Her husband plays a supporting role, her Chief-of-Staff.
 
This show prepares the public for Hillary Clinton's 2008 Presidential bid. It also contributes to the unrealistic expectations and false sense of entitlement young women have today, making it harder for them to form successful families.
 
The success of this behavior modification campaign in the media and schools is confirmed by recent British statistics showing the rapid disintegration of the nuclear family. It is also confirmed by unprecedented sexual depravity exhibited by young women expressing their total confusion and despair. (I will elaborate below.)
 
The "White House Project," a lobby dedicated to putting a woman in the White House, sponsored an advance screening of "Commander in Chief" in New York with the lead writer Stephen Cohen and prominent women journalists in attendance. The President of this organization, located at 110 Wall Street, Marie Wilson, is also co-founder of the "Take Your Daughter to Work" organization. http://www.thewhitehouseproject.org/
 
Nearby at 120 Wall Street, you'll find "Girls Inc." an organization with chapters all over the US dedicated to making girls "strong, smart and bold." It encourages young girls to be self absorbed and ambitious and to make marriage and family their second priority.
 
http://www.girlsinc.org/ic/page.php?id=8
 
Google "Girl Power" and you'll get an assortment of these elite-sponsored projects. Search "Boy Power" and you'll find, "Lawn Boy Recalls Power Mower" and "Lazy-Boy Introduces Power Recliner."
 
Only a subverted nation empowers its young females at the expense of its males. International finance is dedicated to destroying the nuclear family and submerging the US in a world dictatorship. As I will show later, this has been the Illuminist banker goal for 200 years. But first I will explain why "empowering" females leads to a breakdown of heterosexual marriage and family.
 
THE HETEROSEXUAL DYNAMIC
 
I do not believe that all young women must marry and have children. However this is the healthy and natural instinct of the vast majority, and is necessary for the perpetuation of society. To encourage them to pursue high-powered careers before they establish strong families is doing them and society a deliberate injustice.
 
Henry Kissinger once said, "Power is the greatest aphrodisiac."
 
Women are attracted to powerful men.
 
Powerful women repulse men.
 
Heterosexual marriage is based on a woman surrendering worldly power to a man who is dedicated to her and their children's welfare. Trust and surrender is the way a woman empowers and loves a man. This is the essence of heterosexual marriage. The man earns this trust through a patient process of courtship. The woman must consider her choice carefully.
 
When women challenge and usurp male leadership, marriages fall apart. Masculinity is defined by power. Give women power in an intimate setting and you have "phallic" women and emasculated men. The glue is dissolved.
 
Femininity is defined by love and nurturing. To a degree, a woman sacrifices worldly ambition for her husband and children. Women get love by making this sacrifice. Men get love by accomplishments.
 
Young women no longer know how to sacrifice. By "empowering females" young women are conditioned to behave as males.
 
Everyone suffers as a consequence but women suffer most. Their lifespan averages 80 years yet their peak years of fertility (and sexual attraction) end around age 32. In other words, they have approximately 12 years to marry and start a family or they may be alone for almost 50 years. Men whose sexual attraction increases with age and confidence have more time.
 
A British actuarial study reported Friday that marriage is in terminal decline. In the period from 2003 until 2031, the proportion of those never married by age 45 is expected to rise from 14 to 40 per cent for males and nine to 35 per cent for females.
 
http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml? xml=
/news/2005/09/30/nmarr30.xml
 
The statistics for children born-out-of-wedlock are devastating. "More than 42 of every 100 babies were born outside marriage last yearin 1994 the figure was 32 per cent and in the early 1970s it was less than 10 per cent."
 
According to the report, children brought up by married parents fare better than those raised by cohabiting or single parents. Yet the Illuminist UK government has abolished the married couples allowance and its tax credit system favors single parents.
 
FEMALE SEXUAL DESPAIR
 
"Girls Gone Raunch" a thoughtful article in Canada's Macleans magazine confirms that young women today equate female empowerment with sexual depravity. Encouraged to compete with men, and spurred by Paris Hilton and Britney Spears, they have adopted promiscuity more common to single males.
 
http://www.macleans.ca/topstories/life/article.jsp?
content=20050926_112700_112700
 
"I was pretty stunned by what I saw in high school students," said Ariel Levy, the author of a study. What she observed was girls everywhere, even at the most progressive schools, doing their best to look the "skankiest," trying to "look as slutty, willing and wanton" as they could. Snapping their thongs and baring their cleavages, these girls had astoundingly gone any sexist male one step better: they were treating themselves and each other like pieces of meat.
 
When Levy asked one high school student why she was dressed like that and told her that in her own day, "you would have been embarrassed, ostracized to look like that," she looked at me like I was absolutely from Mars and said, 'How did you get the guy? Charm?'"
 
If anything, admits Levy, women caught up in the "liberating" aspects of raunch "think of men as superior. Over and over again these women are telling me they want to be like a guy. It's really fascinating. It's fetishizing masculinity in the sense that maleness in this equation means smart, funny, capable, brave, sexually adventurous, all of that."
 
Levy is mystified that feminism, which ostensibly aimed to give young women self-respect, has resulted in their selling themselves like meat.
 
She shouldn't be surprised. Feminism was always about rejecting femininity and usurping the masculine role. Femininity is based on women's consecration to a future husband and family. Feminism taught them to be like men and have sex without love or commitment.
 
THE ILLUMINATI PROGRAM
 
"Free love" and the abolition of the family are main tenets of the "Communist Manifesto" (1848). The success of the Communist subversion of America is shown by our inability to comprehend that this has already taken place. Communism is a front for a scheme to assume control of the world by an ancient satanic cult backed by international bankers. They sponsor most of what ails the world today, including female empowerment.
 
The Rothschilds formed the modern form of this cult, the Illuminati, in 1776. Shortly afterward, defectors revealed the secret plans to subvert Western (Christian) civilization. On the subject of women, one Illuminati document explained:
 
"There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women. These should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation...of standing up for themselves...it will cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowing that they do so; for they will only be indulging their own desire for personal admiration." (James Wardner, Unholy Alliances 1996, p.35)
 
Another Illuminati document, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion (1905) talks about eliminating the family and using democracy to manipulate and control the masses. "By cultivating in all a sense of self-importance, we shall destroy among the goyim the importance of the family and its educational value...In this way we shall create a blind mighty force which will never be in a position to move in any direction without the guidance of our agents..." (Protocol 10-5)
 
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion4.htm#Protocol%20%20No.%2010
 
CONCLUSION
 
Obviously many people will do whatever they are told and imitate whatever is "cool." They have not yet learned to distrust the media, government and education.
 
Female empowerment is a cruel hoax. It flatters and lures young women with money and recognition and paints marriage and family in a dreary light. Thus many women are deprived of a lifetime of love from husband and children.
 
The Illuminati-Communists advance their plan by a policy of divide-and- rule: world war, class war, race war and now gender war. Crime, corruption, dysfunction and decadence are other weapons in their secret war on humanity.
 
The purpose of female empowerment is to dissolve the family and to increase our dependence on the media and government, which are both owned and controlled by agents of Illuminist bankers.
_____
 
Henry Makow Ph.D. is the inventor of the game Scruples and author of "A Long Way to go for a Date." His articles exposing fe-manism and the New World Order can be found at his web site www.savethemales.ca He enjoys receiving comments, some of which he posts on his site using first names only. hmakow@gmail.com
Logged
three_sixty
Full Member
***
Posts: 386



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2006, 01:47:20 PM »

may i respond to this even though i am a guy?
Logged
Rootsie
Moderator
Roots
*****
Posts: 958

Rootsie.com


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2006, 11:55:50 PM »

ok
Logged
three_sixty
Full Member
***
Posts: 386



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 21, 2006, 02:41:35 PM »

the author seems to have a chip on his shoulder from something in his life and is now taking it out on women in general. he is using the whole illuminati conspiracy as a vehicle for his own psychosis.

i think he is dancing around some truths though, but missing the mark entirely and coming out looking like a big jerk.

what characteristics are women supposed to exhibit to succeed in a society such as this? nurturing is out the window while competitiveness, mean-spiritedness, and egotism are the crown jewels for which young women are fed to "get ahead." take a look at what the successful women role models are to look like, Margaret Thatcher, Hillary Clinton, Madelaine Albright, Janet Reno, Condeleeza Rice, etc. - all acting out the worst characteristics of men to get ahead in a "man's world."

what is really being suppressed IMO is the loving kindness, nurturing, seat of civilization, spiritual, psychic power of women. the best aspects of women must be corrupted and led astray in order to keep this inverted culture going. THESE powers of women are really the backbone, seat of a society - these are powers that men have historically suppressed in order to maintain their order BECAUSE these are the realms in which women can RULE men. if one could manipulate the following generations of women through cultural and media programming, they could effectively wield the power of women as a tool to control a society. i think we see that in the over-sexualization of women that exists in the marketing field, the fashion industry, and in the media. we can also see the kind of attitudes that are fostered among younger women and girls in the media - it is this competitive, mean-spirited, hyper-image conscious prototype.

these are just some observations(although they may be lacking and biased coming from a male point of view). i encourage others(women) to add to this.
 

__________________

"Now the breaking process is the same for both the horse and the n-word, only slightly varying in degrees. But as we said before, there is an art in long range economic planning. YOU MUST KEEP YOUR EYE AND THOUGHTS ON THE FEMALE and the OFFSPRING of the horse and the n-word. A brief discourse in offspring development will shed light on the key to sound economic principles. Pay little attention to the generation of original breaking, but CONCENTRATE ON FUTURE GENERATION. Therefore, if you break the FEMALE mother, she will BREAK the offspring in its early years of development and when the offspring is old enough to work, she will deliver it up to you, for her normal female protective tendencies will have been lost in the original breaking process. For example take the case of the wild stud horse, a female horse and an already infant horse and compare the breaking process with two captured n-word males in their natural state, a pregnant n-word woman with her infant offspring. Take the stud horse, break him for limited containment. Completely break the female horse until she becomes very gentle, where as you or anybody can ride her in her comfort. Breed the mare and the stud until you have the desired offspring. Then you can turn the stud to freedom until you need him again. Train the female horse where by she will eat out of your hand, and she will in turn train the infant horse to eat out of your hand also."
Logged
three_sixty
Full Member
***
Posts: 386



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2006, 03:22:06 PM »

let's remember the relationship between "pimps" and "hos." and let's remember who the pimps in this system are and the whores under their control. mystery babylon, the mother of harlots is only the work horse for the man behind the curtain(remember, pay no attention).

______________________________

"She love to party, have a good time;
She looks so hearty, feeling fine;
She loves to smoke, sometime shiftin' coke;
She'll be laughin' when there ain't no joke.

A pimper's paradise: that's all she was now;
A pimper's paradise: that's all she was;
A pimper's paradise: that's all she was now;
Pimper's paradise: that's all she was.
(Every need got an ego to feed;
Every need got an ego to feed.)

She loves to model up in the latest fashion (oo-bee doo-be doo);
She's in the scramble and she moves with passion (oo-bee doo-be doo),
She's getting high, trying to fly the sky (oo-bee doo-be doo)!
Eh! Now she is bluesing when there ain't no blues.

Wo-o-o-oh! A pimper's paradise: that's all she was now;
A pimper's paradise: that's all she was, oh-ho-ho-ho-ho!
A pimper's paradise: that's all she was now;
A pimper's paradise: that's all she was.

(Every need got an ego to feed;
Every need got an ego to feed.)

Wo-ho-o-oh! A pimper's paradise: that's all she was now, wo-oo-o-oo! Wo-oh!
A pimper's paradise: that's all she was. We-e-e-ell-a!
A pimper's paradise: I'm sorry for the victim now;
Oh, now soon their (pimper's paradise) - soon their heads - soon their -
Soon their very heads will bow.
(Pimper's paradise) Don't lose track - don't lose track of yourself, oh no!
(Pimper's paradise) Don't be just a stock - a stock on the shelf -
stock on the shelf, oh-oh!
(Pimper's paradise) that's all she was now. Wo-oo-o-oo-o-oo ... "


- Bob Marley
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!